Jag tittar bara på fakta, eller resultat också kallat för verklighet i motsats på dom s k 97% av politiska vetenskapsmän som litar på datorsimuleringar.
Skönt att någon sektmedlem har modet att erkänna att de har kanske upp mot 97% av vetenskapsmännen mot sig..
Kan du nämna nån forskare som stöder teorin att vi är påväg mot en katastrof "om tio år"
jodå men håll med om att dom få sk vetenskapsmän som är klimatförnekare är gamla gubbar som jag skrev med ena foten i graven å kan skita i allt vad klimatkatastrofer heter då det ju är snart dags för andra foten
Så sant och kan ju tilläggas att sanningen överröstas ofta av bruset av denna grupp.
Han skriv Citat "Jag tittar bara på fakta, eller resultat också kallat för verklighet i motsats på dom s k 97% av politiska vetenskapsmän som litar på datorsimuleringar." slut citat.
electroverse.net
Fast det ser ut som dom har redan gett upp.Slutet är nära...
Det roliga med s k klimatexperter som verkligen njuter av statlig stöd är, att som t ex Johan Rockströms artiklar finns inte någon hänvisning till faktakällor. Bara samma bladder om havsnivåhöjningar, tippingpoint, tio års gräns m m.Av någon underlig anledning så är dessa "forskare" inte beroende av "klimatforskningsmedel", de är oftast forskare inom ämnen som utifrån ett naturvetenskapligt perspektiv kan förhålla sig till de fysikaliska och kemiska förhållanden som kan förklara uppvärmning, strålning och klimatförändringar.
Vi har idag mängder med forskare som håller på med "hållbarhet" och de lutar sig alltid mot klimatförändringar när de söker medel - här finns t ex nationalekonomer, vilka då räknas in bland klimatforskare.
I min värld så har det oändligt mycket större betydelse vad en sådan här forskare hävdar, än vad alla dessa flugor som surrar runt klimatforskningsmedel påstår.
Acclaimed Israeli Astrophysicist Suggests The Sun Drives Earth's Climate, Not CO2 - Electroverse
Acclaimed Israeli Astrophysicist Suggests That The Sun Drives Earth's Climate, Not CO2: Grand Solar Minimum and Pole Shift
"ACCLAIMED ISRAELI ASTROPHYSICIST SUGGESTS THE SUN DRIVES EARTH’S CLIMATE, NOT CO2
Nir Shaviv is an Israeli astrophysicist and chairman of Jerusalem’s Hebrew University’s physics department. He says that his research, and that of colleagues, suggests that rising CO2 levels play only a minor role in earth’s climate compared to the influence of the sun and cosmic radiation.
“Global warming clearly is a problem, though not in the catastrophic terms of Al Gore’s movies or environmental alarmists,” said Shaviv. “Climate change has existed forever and is unlikely to go away. But CO2 emissions don’t play the major role. Periodic solar activity does.”
But I thought that 97% of climate scientists agreed that human activity is the main driver of climate change?
“Only people who don’t understand science take the 97% statistic seriously,” said Shaviv. “Survey results depend on who you ask, who answers and how the questions are worded. In any case, science is not a democracy. Even if 100% of scientists believe something, one person with good evidence can still be right.”"
...
Några andra citat:
Dr. Andrew Lacis, NASAClimatologist and IPCC contributor: “There is no scientific merit to be found in the Executive Summary. The presentation sounds like something put together by Greenpeace activists and their legal department."
Dr. Richard Courtney, a UN IPCC expert reviewer and a UK-based climate and atmospheric science consultant: “To date, no convincing evidence for AGW (anthropogenic global warming) has been discovered. And recent global climate behaviour is not consistent with AGW model predictions”.
Dr. Lee Gerhard, retired Kansas State Geologist, is past president of the AAPG Division of Environmental Geosciences and IPCC contributor: "I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) concept until the furor started after [NASA's James] Hansen's wild claims in the late 1980's. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting at first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false."
Dr. Yuri Israel, vice-chairman of the IPCC until September 2008: "There is no proven link between human activity and global warming. I think the panic over global warming is totally unjustified. There is no serious threat to the climate."
Slovene Climatologist Dr. Lucka Bogataj, IPCC committee member: "Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don't cause global temperatures to rise.... temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed."
Dr Indur Goklany, B.Tech. Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Expert Reviewer, IPCC (2005-2007): "Climate change is unlikely to be the world's most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk."
Dr. Harry Lins managed the USGS Global Change Hydrology Program from 1989 to 1997, and served as Co-Chair of the IPCC Hydrology and Water Resources Working Group: "Surface temperature changes over the past century have been episodic and modest and there has been no net global warming for over a decade now. The case for alarm regarding climate change is grossly overstated."
...
Jämför man med vad som hände bortom 4.000 år är det lugna puckar.
Nir Shaviv, Henrik Svensmark och Valentina Zharkova. Jag tror att dessa personer sitter på en bomb. De har en bra förklaring till att vi går mot kallare väder och eventuellt kallare klimat. Vi känner till några egenskaper hos solen som dess gravitation, position. Det är först nu bevisen blir starkare för att solens magnetism har en kraftig inverkan på kliimatet på grund av molnbildningen.Av någon underlig anledning så är dessa "forskare" inte beroende av "klimatforskningsmedel", de är oftast forskare inom ämnen som utifrån ett naturvetenskapligt perspektiv kan förhålla sig till de fysikaliska och kemiska förhållanden som kan förklara uppvärmning, strålning och klimatförändringar.
Vi har idag mängder med forskare som håller på med "hållbarhet" och de lutar sig alltid mot klimatförändringar när de söker medel - här finns t ex nationalekonomer, vilka då räknas in bland klimatforskare.
I min värld så har det oändligt mycket större betydelse vad en sådan här forskare hävdar, än vad alla dessa flugor som surrar runt klimatforskningsmedel påstår.
Acclaimed Israeli Astrophysicist Suggests The Sun Drives Earth's Climate, Not CO2 - Electroverse
Acclaimed Israeli Astrophysicist Suggests That The Sun Drives Earth's Climate, Not CO2: Grand Solar Minimum and Pole Shift
"ACCLAIMED ISRAELI ASTROPHYSICIST SUGGESTS THE SUN DRIVES EARTH’S CLIMATE, NOT CO2
Nir Shaviv is an Israeli astrophysicist and chairman of Jerusalem’s Hebrew University’s physics department. He says that his research, and that of colleagues, suggests that rising CO2 levels play only a minor role in earth’s climate compared to the influence of the sun and cosmic radiation.
“Global warming clearly is a problem, though not in the catastrophic terms of Al Gore’s movies or environmental alarmists,” said Shaviv. “Climate change has existed forever and is unlikely to go away. But CO2 emissions don’t play the major role. Periodic solar activity does.”
But I thought that 97% of climate scientists agreed that human activity is the main driver of climate change?
“Only people who don’t understand science take the 97% statistic seriously,” said Shaviv. “Survey results depend on who you ask, who answers and how the questions are worded. In any case, science is not a democracy. Even if 100% of scientists believe something, one person with good evidence can still be right.”"
...
Några andra citat:
Dr. Andrew Lacis, NASAClimatologist and IPCC contributor: “There is no scientific merit to be found in the Executive Summary. The presentation sounds like something put together by Greenpeace activists and their legal department."
Dr. Richard Courtney, a UN IPCC expert reviewer and a UK-based climate and atmospheric science consultant: “To date, no convincing evidence for AGW (anthropogenic global warming) has been discovered. And recent global climate behaviour is not consistent with AGW model predictions”.
Dr. Lee Gerhard, retired Kansas State Geologist, is past president of the AAPG Division of Environmental Geosciences and IPCC contributor: "I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) concept until the furor started after [NASA's James] Hansen's wild claims in the late 1980's. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting at first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false."
Dr. Yuri Israel, vice-chairman of the IPCC until September 2008: "There is no proven link between human activity and global warming. I think the panic over global warming is totally unjustified. There is no serious threat to the climate."
Slovene Climatologist Dr. Lucka Bogataj, IPCC committee member: "Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don't cause global temperatures to rise.... temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed."
Dr Indur Goklany, B.Tech. Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Expert Reviewer, IPCC (2005-2007): "Climate change is unlikely to be the world's most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk."
Dr. Harry Lins managed the USGS Global Change Hydrology Program from 1989 to 1997, and served as Co-Chair of the IPCC Hydrology and Water Resources Working Group: "Surface temperature changes over the past century have been episodic and modest and there has been no net global warming for over a decade now. The case for alarm regarding climate change is grossly overstated."
...
