De här två herrarna är inte vilka vetenskapsmän som helst. Den som tar sig tid och läser igenom detta inte alltför svårlästa
paper kanske till slut kan förstå att hela klimathysterin är helt fel ute och att CO2 är en väg som leder till en katastrof som kommer att göra oss alla fattiga. Om man förstår det som
William Happer Professor of Physics, Emeritus Princeton University
Richard Lindzen Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science Emeritus Massachusetts Institute of Technology
skriver så skakar man bara på huvudet åt de som pratar om att "majoriteten klimatforskare" säger si eller så.
Låt oss lyssna på vetenskapen istället:
Ur rapporten:
Specifically focusing on the use, or failure to use, the scientific method provides four scientific reasons, each of which alone demonstrates there is no risk of catastrophic global warming caused by fossil fuels and CO2:
1. None use the scientific method.
2. None of the models work.
3. All omit contradictory data.
4. CO2 is “saturated” at today’s level, so more CO2 will cause little warming
Se t ex vad de skriver rörande punkt 4:
4. CO2 is “Saturated” at Today’s Level, So More CO2 Will Cause Little Warming
Both of us have special expertise in radiation transfer, the prime mover of the greenhouse effect in Earth’s atmosphere. It is important to understand the radiation physics of what the effect is of adding CO2 at current atmospheric concentrations.
CO2 becomes a less effective greenhouse gas at higher concentrations because of what is often called “saturation.” Each additional 100 ppm increase of CO2 in the atmosphere causes a smaller and smaller change in “radiative forcing,” or in temperature. The saturation is shown in the chart below. 42
Less Global Warming for Each Additional 100 Parts-Per-Million- by-Volume of CO2 Concentration (1,000 ppm maximum)
(The radiative forcings, ΔF from CO2 of concentration c are well described by the formula ΔF = δF log2 (1 + c/c0) for the top of the atmosphere, δF = 3 Wm−2 and the saturation concentration is c0 = 0.3725 ppm.)
This means that from now on our emissions from burning fossil fuels will have little impact on global warming. We could emit as much CO2 as we like with little warming effect. There is no climate emergency. No threat at all.
Saturation also explains why temperatures were not catastrophically high over the hundreds of millions of years when CO2 levels were 10-20 times higher than they are today, shown in the chart “Geological times scale: Concentration of CO2 and Temperature fluctuations” above.
Further, as a matter of physics, saturation explains why reducing the use of fossil fuels to “Net Zero” by 2050 would have a trivial impact on climate, also contradicting theory it is urgently necessary to eliminate fossil fuel CO2 to avoid catastrophic global warming. Adding more CO2 to the atmosphere slightly decreases the amount of long-wave infrared radiation that goes to space, called the “flux.” The details are shown in the graph below. ...
"Vi" har alltså bidragit med 3,6% av Jordens uppvärmning. Låter det mycket? 3,6% av 1,5 grader C = 0,054 grader Celcius. Den som vill kan ju känna klimatskam. 
Antagligen skulle Jorden, med dess växande befolkning, må bra av CO2-haler runt 800 ppm? Växterna lär inte klaga i alla fall.
